The moment
The corridor is being repriced in real time.
Hormuz has been largely shut since February, and the world's oil and LNG flows are re-planning around it. America's largest grid operator runs an emergency capacity auction this month because data-center load outgrew it. Europe enters winter on its thinnest gas storage in fifteen years — while a French fund takes control of the Greece–Cyprus electricity link and Suez claws back to two-thirds of normal. Wherever you move cargo, develop assets, or insure either: the map under your decisions moved this year.
Who it serves
Built for the teams making corridor decisions
The same physical system underwrites very different decisions. InfraTrack serves the three teams that have to be right about it.
Investment & Corp Dev
Decide which infrastructure projects are credible enough to build a position, a bid, or a partnership around — status, ownership, funding turns, and dependencies verified against sources, not press releases.
Strategy & Intelligence
Keep the house view current: what actually changed since your last review, what it re-prices, and which developments deserve a place on the leadership agenda next quarter.
Risk & Leadership
See the constraints that delay or derail projects — permits, grid connections, water, security events at chokepoints — early enough to adjust exposure rather than explain it afterwards.
What it answers
The questions InfraTrack answers
- Which projects are credible? Status and ownership verified per asset, with the date we checked.
- What changed since the last review? Funding, control, schedule, and security developments — source-linked.
- What constraints could delay the project? Permitting, grid interconnection, water, opposition, chokepoint exposure.
- Which assets, counterparties, and events should be watched? A named watchlist, not a data dump.
- What does the change mean for your decision? Analyst interpretation in your context — the part a database can't do.
The deliverable
A corridor decision brief — for any corridor, anywhere
Scoped to the corridor your decision depends on. Issued in days, verified the week it ships.
What the brief contains
- 10–15 page decision brief on your corridor window
- Custom project and asset watchlist
- Status, ownership, dependency, and risk review per watchlist item
- Full source appendix — every claim traceable
- 45-minute walkthrough with the analyst
- One revision round
- One 30-day change update
Pilot engagement
Any region the datasets cover — deepest off-the-shelf coverage today: the Eastern Mediterranean. Continuing monitoring and material-change reporting are scoped after the pilot, once your watchlist exists.
Evidence first
Read the sample before you talk to us
A condensed sample from our deepest-covered corridor, the Eastern Mediterranean — the structure, scoring, and sourcing every pilot delivers, whichever corridor yours covers. Full pilot briefs run 10–15 pages around your watchlist.
Prefer Word? Download the DOCX. Corridor statuses verified as of August 2026; client briefs are re-verified in the week of issuance.
The engagement
How it works
- Define the decisionA 30-minute scoping call: your corridor window, exposure, and the decision the brief must support.
- Build the watchlistWe name the projects, assets, counterparties, and events that actually bear on it.
- Review evidenceStatus, ownership, dependencies, and the constraints that could delay each item — verified against sources.
- Receive the briefThe written product plus a 45-minute walkthrough, with one revision round.
- Monitor changesA 30-day change update is included; ongoing monitoring is scoped from your watchlist.
The principle
A score without a reason is not intelligence
Every number in InfraTrack exposes its components, weights, data vintage, and scoring version. Every curated event carries its source link, its date, and a verification tag — official, confirmed, single-source, or analysis. Curated statuses are re-verified before any client deliverable ships, and the product tells you when each item was last checked rather than calling itself real-time. The full methodology, including every data source and license, is public: infratrack.energy/methodology.
The compute vertical
Speed-to-Power — where can new load actually connect?
The same scoring engine, pointed at a different question: how fast can a region actually take new AI or industrial load?
Binding constraints are treated as binding: Dublin's grid-connection moratorium caps its score at Slow no matter how good everything else looks. Northern Virginia, Phoenix, and Dublin are scored publicly as the engine's proof — see the cluster comparison or Dublin's gating constraint on the live map.
Provenance
Who is behind this
The analyst
Vassilis Konstantinou — NYU Master's research on energy security & geopolitics. Analysis and curation are one person's accountable judgment, with the methodology published for inspection. Family roots in Eastern-Mediterranean shipping and logistics — Emvélia.
The data
Global Energy Monitor · US NGA World Port Index · WRI Aqueduct 4.0 · World Bank Open Data · OpenStreetMap · Natural Earth · Wikidata · own verified event compilations. Every dataset passes a license-and-attribution gate before it can ship.
The discipline
Versioned scores (current: s2p-0.1.0), per-item "as of" dates, and verification tags on every curated event. Corridor statuses verified as of August 2026; the signal feed shows its own update date. Nothing here is claimed to be real-time.
Begin
Request a corridor brief
Pilot engagements from €2,500 — or book a scoping conversation first. Tell us about the decision; we reply within one business day.